39 mins read
Spread the love

All evidence in this report is sourced from a sampling of four different official MGS MOC image strips of the same area within the east side of Wirts Crater. You should know this because some of the evidence samples seen here will appear at first to be quite different from each other and may be confused as being completely different unrelated objects. However, the truth I’m going to try to convey in this report is that, despite surface appearance differences, what you will see here is actually all the same type of evidence, just seen in different stages of changing transition.

This dynamic change factor is evidence of not just life on Mars but life perhaps so unfamiliar and strange to us that this factor alone may make it very hard to interpret and therefore accept for some. Good understanding is going to be difficult to convey in this kind of compact reporting style with only five images. That limited loading space would normally be reserved for different views of evidence within the same strip must less four strips. To cover this evidence adequately would normally take entire volumes of analysis with a great many images but I’m going to try the basics of it here because I think you should be exposed to this kind of evidence and especially its implications.

Just be forewarned that, depending on viewer psychology, some that can realize the full implications of this evidence could find it a bit intimidating and disturbing. So look to yourself and, if you are very sensitive, you should perhaps use discretion about reviewing evidence of this character.

The above first image is from strip E03-00630 taken on 4/6/2001 and is a very distant view that demonstrates the transition of two different types of terrain coming together and joining. The dark upper portion area is officially labeled only as “dark material” and my imaging is also only a small sampling of this type of terrain extending further up the strip. However, close examination reveals that the dark area is actually mostly image tampering hiding something there and creating the illusion of a different type of terrain. Since I don’t want to get bogged down here spending a bunch of time on explaining the complexity of this type of image tampering, let’s just get on with examining the dramatic shiny objects in the lower part of the image that are the main thrust of this report.

These shiny objects extend well below the point in the strip I’ve taken my above sample image from. Unfortunately, this strip, as with most of these strips of this particular type of evidence, will not allow much of a zoom factor to get a closer look. These objects are officially identified as “dunes”and they do sort of look like sand dunes in the above first image, that is if you don’t examine them and the terrain around them too close. Take note that these “dune” formations appear to exist isolated and alone in their immediate environment. That is, if they are sediment based, such as loose sand accumulations, the most obvious observation is where is there sufficient sediment or sand evidence in the rest of the terrain that might enable and support their existence? Loose sediment sand dunes simply do not form without plenty of sand resource in the rest of their environment.

It is anticipated that official reasoning might counter that these dunes may have sort of solidified or concretized together in the wind shaped forms you see here in more ancient times forming a buried solidified mass that later resisted being blown away by the same powerful winds that may have uncovered and exposed them and removed the still loose sediment from around them that have also been in this environment. You can see that they are quite light reflective in the above first image implying a hard surface and, although this factor might also tend to imply something more anomalous, it still also might tend to add support to such anticipated official theorizing.

In the top first image, note to that all these forms rise fairly sharply to an elevation on one side edge and then start a long taper down to the ground on the other side edge giving them a leaning look. Such a shape also tends to support a tapered wind swept look. The many other objects further down this particular strip also have this same basic shape and look in this imaging taken on 4/6/2001 according to official statistics.

However, the above second image from strip E12-03506 taken on 1/31/2002 over nine months later demonstrates a sample of more of these “dunes” in the same east side area within Wirtz Crater. The object imaged here is just one of many similar ones spread across the full vertical length of the strip. Here again this strip will not allow much of a zoom factor because the resolution has been degraded. It should be pointed out that this degree of severe resolution limitation is not normal in the MOC strips, which will often average about 150%-250% or more zoom factor before pixelization and detail degradation becomes too much of a factor. Someone apparently just doesn’t want us to take a closer look.

Note the most obvious differences here between the objects in this strip and those in the top first image. Note how dull, dark, and light absorbing this “dune” object appears here. Although still in the same basic shape as the objects in the top first image, note that this object now appears to have softer more rounded contours relative to the sharp rather severe edge shapes of the objects in the top first image here and how it now lacks any light reflectivity at all in sharp contrast with the shapes in the top first image. This is typical of the many other objects in this strip.

Note that the elevated higher side on our right appears to have a flattened ground level extension area anchoring out further right into the terrain in addition to that on the typical opposite side also tapering down to ground level. It will become more apparent as you read on in this report that this is a function of this object beginning to change shape as the elevated side moves from a more leaning to one side shape as is the top first image here to a more centered position within the mass and that leaves the right vacated side more flattened where it is still anchored into the terrain there.

Note the lack of any apparent loose sediment of any kind in the immediate surrounding terrain. Note to how bright light reflective and over saturated the surrounding terrain is in sharp contrast to the object effectively preventing closer examination. As will become more apparent, this is just one of several forms of image tampering trying to obscure the terrain around this object not only to hide what is there but also to prevent the determination of the true size scale involved here in this whole strip while at the same time lightening the color of the object itself. If this light color over saturation were returned to normal, the objects would then appear as the really are, as almost black super light absorbing areas in the terrain that could have never remotely been confused with terrain geology. Think about that.

Now take a look at the above third image sourced from strip E09-01784 taken on 10/24/2001 some six plus months later than the top first image and three months before the second image in the same area within the Wirtz Crater. This again samples a small portion of a larger field of these objects near the bottom of the strip. Here again we are back to an apparent more distant view similar to the top first image distant view and again the resolution is so degraded that it will not allow much of a zoom factor and closer look.

Even so, you can still clearly see that these objects have now taken on a more centered, upright, humped, swelled, and no longer a leaning to one side shape. Note also that, although these objects have the darker dull light absorbing quality, they are now beginning to show the suggestion of a more translucent quality along with it. Note again how strangely bright light colored and over saturated the surrounding terrain appears in relation to the dull darker light absorbing quality of these objects that effectively prevents closer examination of that adjacent terrain. Note again the absence of sediment or sand concentrations in that surrounding terrain to support the “dunes” concept.

Most obvious of all , note how you can now clearly see numerous dark streak lines associated with each object. Take special note that many of these streaks extend right up to the outer perimeter edge of any one object but then appear to be cut off sharply by that edge and never go beyond that point out into the adjacent surrounding open terrain. Clearly the streaks appear confined to the objects and do not breach their outer perimeter. This tends to imply that these streaks are not likely something associated with the outer surface of the objects but are more probably confined within them. Note to that the traversing streaks and their directions also appear to be oriented quite at random without any apparent organization pattern to them. Also, note that the thickness of a streak can vary along its length.

As I have mentioned before in other reports, I have seen many strips with similar appearing streaks in the open terrain in great numbers and just gradually taper out after a long wandering but still directional run. I have always suspected that these streaks may represent the residual passage evidence of life of some kind. Visually, even though seen from a great distance here, they remind me of the residual slime trail track that certain snails leave behind them or some small life form plowing along on our sediment sea bottoms. On Mars, this kind of evidence is most often in open places where I have suspected the presence of shallow water or water saturated ground such as bogs with vegetation but the ever present light color over saturation, degraded resolution, and distant view tampering treatments always prevent sufficient closer examination.

The general official explanation is that such markings in the open are the tracks of dust devils leaving disturbed surface sediment dark trails defining their passage. Perhaps some are but this frankly sounds more like part of the relentless propaganda agenda promoting Mars as a frozen, dry, dead world rather than any kind of objective analysis. For example, how does this official definition explain their concentrations at and confinement to these highly anomalous objects here? How can this explain their being cut off sharply at the outer edge of these objects and the lack of their presence in the immediate adjacent surrounding open terrain? If they are dust devils and therefore the product of weather patterns in open environs, we should be able to see the evidence of it there and not just confined to these anomalous objects. Yet, there is nothing and that is very telling evidence in of itself.

I also bring to your attention our #46 report “The Real Tubes on Mars: Part II” found HERE. It shows a absolutely colossal size tube object that also has some of this streak looking evidence confined within its perimeter. There the surrounding terrain it sits in is also bright light color reflective and over saturated obscuring any effective closer examination of that terrain. Also our older #17 report “A Puzzle! What is This?” found HERE appears to be the same kind of anomalous object evidence as demonstrated here with the same type of translucent quality and streaking evidence. In that report, the object shapes are the same with the same elevated rise on one side tapering out to a low flattened sheet blending in with and anchoring into the terrain it sits in on the opposite side. Note that another typical feature shared by many of these objects is that, while some appear to be isolated from others, some also appear to join and network and most, when in groups of large numbers, are all oriented in the same direction as evidenced in the first image at the top of this report.


The above fourth image is from yet another strip E10-03741 taken on 11/24/2001 of the same area within Wirtz Crater and offers what appears at first to be a closer view of one of these “dune” objects. Note that the dark light absorbing surface of the object is still fairly occluded. Even so, you can still see the now vague but plentiful crisscrossing streak patterns and again you can see that the object suggests a translucent quality. This one with its double hump leaning to one side looking configuration is a little different than some of the others I’ve elected to image here but is still generally typical of the many objects in this strip. Even though appearing to offer a closer view, note again how indistinct, jumbled, and tiny everything in the surrounding terrain is and how over saturated with light color it is so that little detail is viewable or identifiable. This is telling evidence that this is not truly a closer view of the strip and its terrain and what is in it but is really only represents much larger objects in the same size terrain view.

Now we come to the above fifth image of another “dune” object in the same E10-03741 strip taken on 11/24/2001 but now with a increased zoom factor of 200% that this strip did at last allow. However, even with this zoom factor, note that the surrounding terrain is still very little larger than in the other imaging and therefore still a very distant view.

I’ve included imaging this particular object out of the many others in this strip because you can clearly see the land forms on the ground right through the object’s surface and most definitely within its circumference. It is this object’s clearly seen translucent quality that is the most telling evidence of all here. What this tells us is that these anomalies are not solid dense objects and cannot possibly be confused with natural geology sediment or dunes of any kind simply because natural geology does not behave in this fashion. That is also why there is no sediment or sand apparent in the terrain surrounding these objects, because these objects have nothing to do with sediment or sand or natural geology of any kind and sediment was never a true factor in this environment to start with.

Once that grabs you, consider the additional fact that the views provided here in these strips are all very distant no matter how small or large the anomalous objects appear in the imaging. The object above in the fifth image, when the 200% zoom factor is taken away, is one of the smaller objects in the strip but is actually still gigantic by any measure we are familiar with. The terrain around these objects has been heavily blurred with degraded resolution and over saturated with bright light reflectivity, not only to hide tiny evidence, but to obliterate any usable frames of reference that might enable judging the true size scale in these strips. The fact is that all the objects seen here are the size of mountains or mountain ranges and not even remotely the relatively small size of even the largest sand dunes we might imagine and, if you will just think about it, this insight as to true scale should be very enlightening.

This is also why the terrain around the objects is so jumbled and indistinct. It is that way, not only because of the direct tampering applications and light color strong reflection over saturation in the terrain designed to obscure adequate detail, but also to misdirect away from grasping the sheer true great distant view involved here and therefore the true size of these objects. For example, a object the size of a very tall high rise building would be extremely tiny to barely visible at all in these scenes even without the obscuring tampering treatments. In other words, far from being normal “dune” size, these objects are actually colossal in size and the by design official normal looking size impression is merely the result of creative illusion tampering and perception misdirection. Of course, as always and constantly promoted, the sand dune and dust devil concepts continues and reinforces the relentless desired view of Mars as a hard frozen, dry as dust, dead as can be, and uninteresting world with no compelling reason for anyone to look at anything very close.

When you consistently and relentlessly convey this manipulated message over and over again spread across the manipulated visuals of 112,000+ MGS MOC images, you literally repeatedly and constantly overwhelm viewers with misinformation and false information mixed in with some legitimate information and reinforce the false perception that suits your secrecy agenda of ignorance in any potential viewers. This tactic extends back decades to the older Viking and Moon planetary imaging as well as the most recent Mars imaging in the additional many tens of thousands of images. Unfortunately, the news media tracking science just meekly follows along continuing to blindly rubber stamp this misinformation and agenda of ignorance. This is all the public is ever exposed to and it is in this way that scientists and entire populations and their perceptions are subtly but relentlessly manipulated and misdirected.

So, if these anomalous objects are not “dunes” as per general official explanations, then what are they? Because of the effectiveness of the various types of tampering associated with this evidence preventing close enough detailed examinations, I can only be conclusive about just a few things. First is defining what these objects are not and, based on the observations made here and much more, they are most definitely not “dunes” or any other form of natural geology. Of that I am certain.

It should not be forgotten that tampering on Mars usually always means hiding or obscuring civilization evidence. In fact, in the above last two images, very careful close examination of the difficult to view light color over saturated terrain around the objects confirms very tiny civilization evidence in the form of buildings. This evidence does allow confirming the true size scale but it is just too small to get a adequate image of and present here in the smaller compressed files sizes that must necessarily be posted here on the web and so I’ve not attempted to show it.

A obvious question that comes to mind is, are these protective cover structures of some kind like domes? Most of the dome structures on Mars that I’ve reported on are often strange looking relative to domes we are familiar with here on Earth but still are for the most part hard solid objects probably constructed of an advanced resin material inflated in place and, as such, something that we can more easily understand and accept. However, considering the true immense mountainous size of these objects, I can only say that they are a type of strange structure unlike any Mars domes that I’ve previously reported on. Something of such immense size being at times visually very light reflective and hard surface appearing; to softer and dull looking; to less one sided and more centered, swelled and humped shaped looking; to going from no streaks to many streaks; and to going from very dull light absorbing and dark solid looking to having a real transparency quality is all evidence of dynamic changes very suggestive of very high technology and life of some kind, just very different than anything we might be familiar with.

These gigantic size structures appear not to be constructed of any type of traditional rigid resin outer protective cover material we might associate with domes and so I do not believe them to be that. Rather they may be more akin to visual energy fields, perhaps in a semi-liquid semisolid state with both porous and translucent qualities, that is directly manipulated and changeable according to criteria we do not understand. This may even be some kind of super high technology based on living protoplasm biology or plasma fields where the visual changes seen here in texture, density, transparency, etc. may be manipulated by stimuli and metabolic changes. The streaks may represent crawling plasma energy paths temporarily imprinted in the masses as they undergo transition changes.

As an aside, I am also reminded of a scientific development of a new chemical substance that I saw announced some years ago only once. It was I think then called liquid smoke and possibly the lightest compound on Earth. It was very light, porous, transparent, and hard to see if not for a very slight dark tint it had but it was actually a solid. If one were to ratchet up this compound’s appearance to the size of a large mountain similar in size to the object in my last fifth image here and looking through all that much mass, the look would probably be very similar.

But, in the end, until better more informative evidence can be found, the only conclusive thing I can say, in addition to what they are not, is that the dynamic changing nature of these immense masses combined with their at times obvious transparent quality directly or indirectly indicates life of some unknown kind on Mars. It is the only scenario that fits all the evidence. Geology we are familiar with simply does not go through the types of dynamic change patterns evidenced here in just a few months time nor does it have such large scale transparency qualities, so any attempt at any explanation involving geology would likely be completely useless. The only thing left to consider is biological life and/or intelligent life scenarios.

For those who will want or need to disbelieve that these are all the same type of objects because of their dramatically different looks from one strip to another and question their very close proximity to each other, please note the official coordinates of each strip in each of the five images presented above and how they are separated by only tiny sub-fractions of a single coordinate degree that is strictly for data organization and cataloging differentiation purposes. Additionally, in the MSSS graphical interface chart, the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th strips presented here are represented only by a single small mark in the crater and you must pass your computer cursor extremely slowly and careful over it to differentiate that it actually represents three strips instead of just one. This is all very telling evidence and clearly demonstrates that these are all objects of the same location. Now combine that fact with these objects colossal and very unique size and this confirms them as the same objects.

Something I think you should also be aware of and think about is that the last huge “dust” storm that swept around most of the entire planet a year or two ago I believe originated from this very same region of Mars. Now I have become increasingly familiar with official misdirection tactics that constantly promote the propaganda that Mars is a dry as dust world with no life, so I have been suspicious all along that this dust storm may not have been dust at all but atmospheric moisture. Since this event temporarily visually occluding Mars surface from view could be seen via Earth telescopes, an official explanation had to be forthcoming and dust=dry was of course the name of the game to head off any different speculation.

However, consider the possibility that this may not have been dust but actually moisture being temporarily and massively pumped into the Mars atmosphere resulting in the temporary occlusion effect via the creation of atmospheric clouds that could be so easily mistaken for dust storms. Further, the fact that this effect generated from a specific area on Mars would encourage the “dust”storm speculation by those who are unable or unwilling to contemplate moisture and its artificial manipulation by intelligent life. I ask only that you think about it! Could these gigantic objects reported on here be immense atmospheric maintenance devices based on biological super technology? If so, just imagine the sheer power and high technology involved.

For those who can grasp the full implications, this is where an intimidation factor can set in on more sensitive types who may begin to realize that, not only may we not be alone, we also may not be top dog in what we consider our own Galaxy and may have already been sharing it with others. Further, perhaps others who may not regard us as being of any real significance in the larger scope of things. What a blow to our ego! However, if there is such immense power so near to us, don’t worry because it has probably existed for a very long time without any apparent negative impact on us.

Also, as an aside, I would like to remind you to consider the fact that Earth with its tremendous gravity well is a world of roughly 70% water and 30% exposed land mass and the billions of human intelligent life occupying Earth do so mostly in that 30% land mass space. Alternately, although Mars with its lesser gravity well is smaller in circumference than Earth, it is much larger than Earth in terms of available land mass space. In other words, if Mars is able to support intelligent civilized life as the growing body of evidence seen here at this website indicates, then the fact is that there is an awful lot of land space for tremendous population expansion well beyond that available on Earth. Further, add to that the fact that Mars is an old world with plenty of development time. The implications should be clear.

Such speculatory concepts do depend to some extent on Mars not being as cold or as dry of moisture as officially depicted. In fact, when all the liquid surface water evidence I’ve been holding back is released in conjunction with the book, you will clearly see that such speculation literally holds considerably more water (pun intended) than you might at first have thought. It want be too long now and you’ll see what I mean.


To check behind me in verifying this evidence in the official science data, the easiest to access is at the MSSS website links below for these four image strips. All the strips available at each URL work and all agree on orientation. All will allow you to see in your browser basically what you see presented here without the need of special graphics software. Of course, in doing so, you have the additional advantage of seeing the rest of the objects available in these strips not imaged here and you’re urged to do this. The one exception is that you will need graphics software to zoom in and match the last and most telling fifth image presented here at a 200% zoom factor. However, even at the smaller size official 100% resolution, the translucent quality of this particular object and the land forms within it can still be clearly seen.

E03-00630 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/images/E03/E0300630.html

E12-03506 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e07_e12/images/E12/E1203506.html

E09-01784 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e07_e12/images/E09/E0901784.html

E10-03741 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e07_e12/images/E10/E1003741.html

If you wish to access the Mars graphical interface charts to confirm for yourself how intensely close these strips are to each other in Wirtz crater, you can do so at the links below. Look in the center area of each chart and Wirtz Crater will be the smaller crater to the immediate adjacent right of the larger one known as Galle Crater. The mark you will be looking for is on the east side of Wirtz Crater right of center but still well within the crater outer perimeter. Note that in the chart in the first link below, you will be looking for only a single mark but it will contain within it three different strips and you must move your cursor very slowly and carefully over this mark to differentiate the three separate strips.

Chart 26 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e07_e12/mc26.html (strips E12-03506, E09-01784, & E10-03741)

Chart 26 ….. http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/e01_e06/mc26.html (strip E03-00630)

Loading Facebook Comments ...