As you can see in the above first images, the most clearly anomalous object in this terrain pointed out by the two green arrows is a sort of wedge shaped structure seen near the bottom of the image. Note to what appear to be many closely spaced but vaguely seen tiny dark uniform notches all down its left side straight edge. An image not having to be a lesser quality JPEG image with a fair amount of compression on it here for small file size presentation purposes would reveal these many tiny notches a bit better.
The details of the top of the wedge shape area have been mostly compromised by covering small rectangular structures scattered across its surface with light color coordinated blur/smudge image tampering applications. Note that the right and no doubt largest and tallest portion of this object has been completely hidden by a separate darker blur/smudge tampering application. Hiding this tall portion of the total structure was easy in this case because we are also looking straight down on the top and would have been seeing only its smallest footprint. This is probably a tower like those completely covered up in my previous reports #067 and #068 seen at a more oblique angle. I suspect we are looking directly down on a large tower and the wedge shape area is lower profile artificial structure near or at ground level projecting out from the base area off the left side of the tower.
Fortunately for us, the otherwise thorough tampering applications did not compromise the overall appearance of the wedge shaped area as defined by its clear outline. Obviously what little we can see of this total object in its wedge shaped portion with its uniform notches on the left side edge bears not even a faint resemblance to any natural geology and literally jumps out strongly identifying itself as artificiality. The outline and proportions are just too well defined and too perfectly geometric.
Also, I put this object at the bottom of my image because I wanted you to see the large featureless tampering area left of center in the mid level and the round compound left of center at the top of the image. The tampering is very effective here in these areas and we can’t see much of anything but the tampering should be obvious to you and it clearly suggests hiding something additional and very large in this same area.
In fact, all of this terrain is heavily compromised by image tampering applied at a number of different resolution levels leaving in general only a chaotic jumble of fake detail behind where almost everything is indeterminate and nothing natural much less artificial is identifiable. Sadly, this condition is typical of the entire Moon surface in the 1994 Clementine military imaging. The automated tampering software decision making (in preparation for the later MGS MOC mission to Mars) is very good but not perfect since it did not recognize and cover this highly geometric wedge shaped area along with everything else associated with the tall large structure.
The above second image demonstrates three larger structures pointed out by green arrows in this same type of visually chaotic fake detail terrain that destroys all smaller evidence except for the largest objects. The top left object is essentially completely hidden but the lower left and upper right structures can be partially seen just a little bit because the tampering applications on them did not quite cover everything. Geometric structures tops can be partially seen sticking out of the top of the tampering applications but there just isn’t enough visual information available here to be extrapolating from as to what they area.
Mostly I have included this image just as a sample of the weaker evidence of smaller size but still relatively large structures that exist in the Moon terrain the Clementine imaging, if one looks close enough to find it. This evidence sample increases familiarity with and better understanding of the type of image tampering that it takes to cover this larger size evidence when the closer resolution (not released to the public) finer tampering applications can’t adequately take care of this slightly larger stuff and a another round of tampering application at a more distant resolution must be done as seen above to finish it off with varying degrees of success.
The above split screen third image demonstrates four different evidence sites. The upper left image is of a tower structure pointed out with two green arrows hidden by blur/smudge image tampering very much like those presented in my report #067 and report #068 seen at this more oblique angle giving us a better idea of its height relative to its surroundings. However here, although still very tall dominating everything else in the environment around it and being very large in absolute terms, this tower is not remotely as tall or nearly as massive as the towers in those two previous reports. Because it is so much smaller than those others both in height and in mass, this one blends in with its surroundings better and is also hard to find in the original science data blurry image.
Now I get further out on the proverbial limb with the other three discovery sites in this split screen image. These appear to possibly be portions of monumental faces pointed out by green arrows in each image partially sticking out of a sea of very heavily done smooth featureless image tampering applications. I often seen things like this in terrain’s and usually do not report on it without something else going for it because there is just too much chance for it to be as result of coincidental geology.
However, here the commonality that drew my attention to this and my decision to present these three sites as a group is first the unusual and unique eye appearance, all with the eye strangely wide open in a fixed glare look and the vertically oriented dark center pupil slit increasing this impression. Add to that the fact that all three are in the same general area nearby each other. Add to that, all three exist in seas of extra heavy image tampering coatings blotting out large areas designed to mimic the Moon mare areas. This kind of heavy tampering often, in my opinion, means heavy concentrations of something very big to hide. So, even though only partially seen in this sea of super heavy tampering, these similar objects take on a little more significance.
The object in the upper right image is a very large single eye with anything else covered up by image tampering. The object in the lower left image appears to possibly be a portion of the center area of a face centering on the brows, eyes, and nose with anything else covered up by image tampering. The object on the lower right appears to possibly be a portion of the right side of the face with the emphasis on the right eye (from the object’s perspective), again with anything else mostly covered up by image tampering. Very strange but also very similar and that similarity and commonality between the three nearby sites, in my opinion, strains coincidence just a little too much.
Do I think these are a monumental faces sticking out of the thick image tampering? Well, if forced into it, I’m going to have to reluctantly “guess” no to that one. The evidence is just too limited to be extrapolating from it very much.
Further, even though there are no frames of reference in these images to determine true scale, it is almost certain that this is at the very least very distantly seen based on other Clementine images where true scale can be better determined and, with all the thick tampering, it could be even more distant than usual. That kind of distancing can merge tiny objects together and form false shapes and the human eye tends to exacerbate this by wanting to force shape perception into something more familiar, even if well off the mark.
Further, the very thick heavily done image tampering field tends to frame these objects and present them in a certain pronounced way while at the same time preventing us from seeing the entire object and/or other objects that these shapes may be associated with that might add clarity of interpretation. All that makes me very cautious.
On the other hand, they do look the way they do and there is the undeniable and strangely unique “eye” look similarity common to all three visuals that is unique to this area of the Moon. Then there is the fact that the super heavy image tampering may be hiding very large size dense civilization evidence in this particular area that could support monumental evidence. That at least makes it worth reporting on in my book and I thought you would like to at least take a look at this. Beyond that, care is advised in interpretation and you must decide for yourself its merit.
Now we come to the above fourth and final image. I regard this as the strongest direct evidence of artificial structures in this report and why I saved it for last. Get up close to the screen and examine this parallel linear line evidence very close as pointed out by the green arrows. Even though considerably compromised by image tampering, the perfect rigid uniform right angle geometry and parallel line evidence is undeniable. There is not the slightest chance that this arrow straight and right angle geometry could be associated with natural geology in any way. This evidence undeniably represents artificiality of some kind.
In fact, this is just a representative example of this kind of evidence. It is seen in bits and pieces all over the Moon’s surface. It is a favorite target of the pervasive smooth featureless blur/smudge image tampering applications you see here and that alone indicates a massive and sustained attempt to remove this from view. As the old saying goes, where there is smoke, there is usually fire! Further, I want you to now become aware that every last scrape of this evidence that has partially escaped the image tampering in bits and pieces like this is all in this same rigid vertical/horizontal parallel line pattern oriented south and north all over the mid areas of the Moon surface and no exceptions.
In fact, go back and look at the previous images in this report. Although thoroughly covered up by image tampering, you will see side by side vertical parallel row patterns printing through from underneath the tampering applications. In some cases they may well be digital image splice lines but in many others they are ground level detail covered up by the image tampering applications and yet printing through it in basic shape. The totality of evidence like this over the Moon globally demonstrates that the choice of the south to north orbital path of the Clementine craft and it camera systems had other purposes rooted in secrecy. The choice of orbital path was at least in part made to coincide with, track and map this type of ground based phenomena.
No doubt one reason, in addition to basic information gathering, is so that later, if anyone should question this as ground based evidence, the defense deniability factor would be that this is the junction splice lines digital imaging artifact where the long vertical south to north image strips converging at the South and North Poles were joined. That might fly a bit better when viewing this evidence at the normally supplied science data distant resolution with its high albedo and fuzzy obscuring and often very dark quality.
However, the closer visual examination you see here with clarifying image work confirms that this is actually ground based evidence quite separate from and not to be confused with any orbital path digital imaging or image processing factors. This will become clearer in future upcoming reports as more evidence associated with this accumulates. Meanwhile, in this report, the main thing I want you to be aware of is that this is clearly ground based evidence and just as clearly it at the very minimum is very strong and powerful undeniable direct evidence of artificiality that was not quite all covered up by the prevalent image tampering.
With that said, this evidence still looks strange as to its purpose. Let me say what I think that we are looking at here.
The key is to understand the image tampering and what it is trying to do and the role it plays in the look of this evidence. On larger scale evidence that is being seen directly down on in the camera view, as this evidence is, the smooth featureless tampering application simply maps over and onto the top center area of larger rectangular geometric structures covering everything there and it maps right up very precisely to the outside edges where it stops. This kind of very precise mapping, usually done at and enabled by very close resolution never released to the public, leaves only a very narrow band uncovered at the outside edge and this appears to us as a very narrow lighter color precise line.
As evidence of this, just look very closely in the above fourth image and you will see that the surface texture of the space within any of the rectangular right angle lines is exactly the same smooth featureless tamper coating surface texture as outside the geometric form covering a broader area. As I have previously reported on, this is very similar to or basically the same as image tampering applications in the general Mars terrain mapping up to a round crater and on up its slopes but then skipping over the top rim leaving a narrow more light reflective narrow band and then mapping to and covering the interior of the crater and its interior slopes.
The process leaves the crater rim out as a ragged more high albedo light reflective ring to break up the otherwise smooth featureless quality of the tampering field. This provides a little texture to the otherwise featureless tampering field surface and helps keep it from being readily identifiable as to what it really is.
The capability of precise mapping over the surface of and right up to the edges of geometric structures is also evidenced in the much closer to target objects current Spirit and Opportunity imaging where the applications not only map into the Mars terrain irregular complexity but onto certain parts of the Rover vehicle itself as per some predefined map programming. For example, rectangular geometric solar cells and other items on the Rover equipment are routinely mapped to and their true surface covered over by the tampering applications mapping over their top surface and precisely right to their edges. Evidence of this can be seen in the first image in my report #061 titled “Spirit Mud & Rover Evidence.”
The explanation is that the rows of lines in my fourth image here are evidence of lower profile fairly massive geometric squared and/or rectangular structures of some kind tightly packed in long vertical rows and those rows are always oriented north to south on the Moon. I’m not going to speculate what these rows of structures may be here in this report with its more limited evidence but I will say more in the next two reports on the Moon where additional and accumulating evidence will be presented.
DOCUMENTATION (added 2/15/2010)
The military’s Clementine Lunar Browser (CLIB) version 1.5 has been “retired” and the new “improved” version 2.0 data that replaces it now conveniently (for secrecy) does not contain the discovery evidence presented here in this report and it appears that those former discovery sites have been altered in the 2.0 data to sanitize them away. Therefore, to facilitate verification and prove that the anomalous discoveries were in fact in the older 1.5 science data and part of it for 16 years, the links immediately below access the unaltered version 1.5 originals downloaded by this researcher in 2004 and now parked on this website.
Report 3rd source image from the 1.5 data (upper left panel in 3rd image)
Report 3rd source image from the 1.5 data (upper right & lower left panels in 3rd image)
Report 3rd & 4th source image from the 1.5 data (lower right panel in 3rd image & all of 4th image)
Since the general terrain around these discovery sites can still be identified in the new 2.0 data despite changes, you can compare the old 1.5 versus the new 2.0 sites and see the sanitization for yourself. Even though this may be historically consistent with past secrecy treatment of anomalous Moon evidence, I see this foolishness 16 years later military move targeting these anomalous discoveries as particularly offensive, arrogant, and of very poor judgment. Worse it demonstrates a serious disconnect with and disregard for the American people who paid for this and who’s sole property it is. However, you must decide for yourself.
http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/clementine/clib: This link accesses the Clementine Lunar Image Browser (CLIB) version 2.0 noting that version 1.5 data is now no longer available. There one can search the official military Clementine science data based via either the graphical interface or Moon latitude and longitude coordinates. When using those coordinates below highlighted in green, just enter them in the appropriate coordinate boxes and hit your return or enter key. Remember that latitude coordinate numbers in the southern hemisphere must be preceded by a minus sign.
Report 1st image large wedge shaped structure: At the above link on the form provided enter –35 in the Latitude box and 208 in the Longitude box and then hit your enter or return key.
Report 2nd image several partially hidden structures: At the above link on the form provided enter 35 in the Latitude box and 98 in the Longitude box and then hit your enter or return key.
Report 3rd image smaller tower left upper panel: At the above link on the form provided enter 48 in the Latitude box and 157 in the Longitude box and then hit your enter or return key.
Report 3rd image large eye in right upper panel & face in lower left panel: At the above link on the form provided enter 20 in the Latitude box and 20 in the Longitude box and then hit your enter or return key.
Report 3rd & 4th images face in 3rd image right lower panel & bands in 4th image: At the above link on the form provided enter –3 in the Latitude box and 359 in the Longitude box and then hit your enter or return key